What Is a Focus Group Discussion?

A focus group discussion (or FGD) is a qualitative research method in the social sciences, with a particular emphasis and application in the developmental program evaluation sphere.

FGDs are a predetermined semi-structured interview led by a skilled moderator. The moderator asks broad questions to elicit responses and generate discussion among the participants. The moderator’s goal is to generate the maximum amount of discussion and opinions within a given time period.

When Should You Use a Focus Group Discussion?

Focus group discussions should be used when you need to understand an issue at a deeper level than you can access with a survey. They are helpful for adding meaning and understanding to existing knowledge, or getting at the “why” and “how” of a topic.

A survey would be a good way to learn that 54% of the population prefers Program A. However, a FGD is a good way to learn why  54% of the population prefers Program A.

In addition, FGDs are a good way to verify that people’s stated preferences are the same as their actual preferences. For example, 54% of surveyed people might say that they prefer Program A. However, talking to the group in more detail might reveal that their actual preference is Program B. (Many people answer surveys with what they think the questioner wants to hear, rather than their actual opinions!)

focus group

Creating the Questionnaire

It is important to take time to carefully plan your questions. Poorly-worded, biased, or awkward questions can derail a FGD and spoil the quality of your data.

  • Keep the number of questions reasonable (under 10, if possible). This prevents the participants from getting confused or worn out by a long discussion.
  • Keep the questions simple and short. FGD participants won’t get the chance to see the questions like in a survey.
  • Ensure that the wording on questions is clear. Otherwise, participants will end up discussing the question itself, rather than what the question was trying to ask.
  • Be careful that questions about sensitive issues or topics are asked carefully. Otherwise, the FGD will stop just because people are too embarrassed to answer.
  • Make sure that questions are worded in a way that cannot be answered with a simple “Yes” or “No” answer. Using words like “Why” and “How” will help elicit better responses from participants.

Question Types

There should be three types of questions in a focus group discussion:

  1. Probe questions: these introduce participants to the discussion topic and make them feel more comfortable sharing their opinion with the group
  2. Follow-up questions: delve further into the discussion topic and the participants’ opinions
  3. Exit question: check to ensure that you didn’t miss anything


Say that you run two education programs, and you’d like to know why Program A sees better attendance than Program B. You could use the following questions to explore this issue:

Probe Questions:

  • How familiar are you with our programs?
  • How often do you attend our programs?
  • What is your favorite program?

Follow-Up Questions:

  • What are your favorite and least favorite aspects of Program A?
  • What are your favorite and least favorite aspects of Program B?
  • What influences whether you attend a program?
  • What influences whether your friends attend a program?
  • If we were to close a program, which one should we close and why?

Exit Question:

  • Is there anything else you’d like to say about our programs?
focus group

Length of the Focus Group Discussion

An FGD should be between 60 and 90 minutes.

If the FGD is shorter than 60 minutes, it is often difficult to fully explore the discussion topic. If the FGD is longer than 90 minutes, the discussion can become unproductive (as participants get weary) and the discussion can start to impose on participants’ time.

Selecting the Participants

Focus group discussions involve two to eight people on average. Greater than eight participants becomes crowd for a FGD and is more suited for an advisory board.

Creating homogeneity in the FGD group can help participants feel more comfortable expressing their opinions.

Consider the following when you are choosing your participants:

  • Gender: Will men and women feel comfortable discussing this topic in a mixed-gender group? For example, women might feel uncomfortable discussing maternal health if men are in the group.
  • Age: Will age affect the way that people react to this topic? For example, a young person might feel uncomfortable talking about his drinking habits if older people from his community are in the room.
  • Hierarchy: Will people of different hierarchical positions be able to discuss this topic equally? For example, a student might feel uncomfortable discussing her teachers if the school principal is in the FGD.

Certain criteria should be set up front and used to screen potential FGD participants.

Preparing for the Focus Group Discussion

Make sure the participants have provided informed consent verbally or ideally on a written form, in line with research ethics best practices.

  • Be sure to make the location and time of the FGD are clear to all participants.
  • If you anticipate some participants not showing up, invite 10-20% extra participants. However, be careful to not create too large of a group.
  • Be sure that the FGD is in a public place that is convenient for participants. Consider the location’s proximity to public transportation. If the FGD must happen out in the field, make it as comfortable and convenient for participants as possible.
  • Make sure that the setting does not bias the information being collected.
  • If it is important to collect demographic data from participants (like age, gender, caste, etc), design a short form that takes no more than 2 or 3 minutes to complete. The form can be administered before the focus group starts.

Moderator Techniques for Focus Group Discussions

focus group

As a moderator, it is important to ensure that all participants are comfortable and engaged with the discussion, and that their opinions are being heard. The following techniques are helpful:

  • Remain neutral to ensure that everyone feels comfortable expressing their opinion. No nodding or shaking your head, raising eyebrows, agreeing or disagreeing with comments, or praising or denigrating participants.
  • Elicit further information from shy participants with comments like “Can you tell me more about that?”, “Help me understand what you mean”, or “Can you give an example?”
  • Deal with dominant participants by acknowledging their opinion and soliciting other opinions. Sentences like “Thank you. What do other people think?” can be helpful.
  • Paraphrase or summarize long, unclear comments by participants. This shows participants that the moderator is actively listening, and it helps the moderator to ensure he or she has understood the participant’s statement.
  • Act spontaneously if needed. If the conversation goes in an unexpected, but productive direction, go with it and ask questions that were not on the initial questionnaire. Probe deeper into new topics and ideas, as long as the information being gained is valuable.

Other Things to Note

  • Use a good audio or video recorder. Your smart phone audio recorder works well if the phone has good battery life.
  • Transcribe the FGD as soon as the conversation is completed, so the nuances of the dialogue are not lost in the annals of time.
  • It’s best to take notes in the midst of the dialogue and after the episode with the participants. Reflective notes make for robust qualitative data.
  • Ideally pay a participation fee to the FGD participants, as they might skip productive work to participate in the study. Make arrangements for refreshments too.

Limitations of Focus Group Discussions

It is important to realize that there are several limitations to FGDs. First, since FGD data is qualitative, it cannot necessarily be generalizable to the population. This is because qualitative data is often context specific.

Second, facilitators must ensure that their bias is not evident. Otherwise, it will veer the trajectory of the conversation. They must be also be active in ensuring that active participants do not overpower subdued participants during the discussion.

This blog was co-authored by Monishankar Prasad and Christine Garcia.

Note: This article was originally published on 15 September 2015, then refreshed and updated on 11 September 2017. 


Monishankar works with Atlan to develop resources for nonprofits to better manage their Monitoring & Evaluation processes. He is a development researcher based in Singapore and has worked in the enviro-social consulting space in India, Oman and Singapore. A prolific writer, he has written for Huff Post India and Green Business Singapore and blogs at changethinker.com.


  1. Thank you so much. very helpful for my job as community organizer

  2. K.R.Sairam Reply

    very crisp basic skeleton for conducting FGDs and is user friendly. Thanks

  3. Billowabdi Reply

    Very precise and comprehensive write up. It helped me so much. Thanks a lot. May you send me extra documents on research methods and qualitative data collection tools through [email protected]. I will be grateful if you can help.

    Please help me.
    Have a warm afternoon.

    • Christine Garcia Reply

      Hi Billow, thanks for the message. Unfortunately, we currently don’t have any other resources on qualitative data collection. But we’re working on developing them shortly! We’ll have a few blog posts out, possibly followed by larger guides and resources.

  4. Billow Abdi Reply

    Very precise and comprehensive write-up. please keep up with the good work you are doing. May you send me some articles/Books on Research Methods and qualitative data collection tools (eg Key Informants Interviews and Field Observations).
    I will be grateful if you can help.
    Thanks a lot for the short but productive and relevant note of FGDs.

    Thanks a lot.

    • Christine Garcia Reply

      Hi Billow, thanks for the message. Unfortunately, we currently don’t have any other resources on qualitative data collection. But we’re working on developing them shortly! We’ll have a few blog posts out, possibly followed by larger guides and resources.

  5. Well, we should be able to differentiate between focused group discussion and group interview,….
    I think, the example of questions provided here looks like more relevant for a group interview than an FGD,….

  6. Having used FGDs in a large number of countries across different situations, I have following comments to make:
    – The technique fits perfectly well for educated and elite groups. However, with illiterate and vulnerable people, it has several disadvantages such as their fear to speak up openly, shyness, etc.
    – The formalities in FGD context i.e. moderator, time slot allocated to each participant, etc. are a surprise for many illiterate people! They may think “out-of-place”
    – Getting the attention of poor people to stay on is a challenge
    – It may be necessary to compensate participant’s time in the discussion. Anyway, this is policy is some countries i.e. Cambodia and Vietnam where project budget has to show the FGD cost
    – Keeping a good focus and attention of the entire group is a limitation. Many a times FGD ends up with few who are out-spoken and have utilized much of the allocated time whilst the “invisible people ” do not speak out due to context
    -Don’t under-estimate the ability of FGDs to generate some quantifiable data too. I’ve done this with success when pressed for time where a questionnaire survey could not be accommodated due to many reasons
    – As mentioned, FGD is not recommended in the context of discussions with vulnerable people
    – We do not go for a FGD with a list of well-prepared questions. You should have some broad areas noted down to probe on. In a FGD setting, one moves to several questions following a trigger!

    • hello! I am currently doing my thesis and I am using FGD. My guide questions were formulated by me with the aid of my panel and adviser. However, I don’t know what validation test and reliability procedures to do for my guide questions. Thank you in advance for your response.

  7. Alexandra Robinson Reply

    Thanks for another great, concise guide! I would argue that FGDs should not always be held in a private space, particularly for sensitive discussions. While it is often very difficult to find private locations to conduct qualitative interviews, FGDs that cover sensitive topics require a safe environment for participants; privacy is often integral to safety! As best practice, the location and make-up of the FGD should be contextualized to local social, gender, and power dynamics!

    • Alexandra Robinson Reply

      Correction *Should not always be held in a PUBLIC space!

  8. Thank you . Very informative, easy and simple to understand for us beginners

  9. Aimee Chris Reply

    Thanks for the write up.its of much benefit to me. What about the key indepth interview can anything be written on it.

  10. Charles Augustine Reply

    A very useful and needed artcle.
    Consists of every aspect of an FGD.

  11. Dr Yakubu Anas Reply

    This is a valuable resource for result oriented programmes assessment.

    Thanks a lot

  12. Very useful!! A valuable well compiled guide for me and my field data collection associates.

  13. Kirumira Mukasa Reply

    Very informative,I am currently using the tips to conduct an FGD for my Research topic.

  14. Pingback: 5 Ways To Make Money Fast For Your Family - RUN THE MONEY

  15. Gnanasekar Reply

    Its very useful and precise key points about FGD. Great contribution. Thank you

  16. Dr Yakubu Anas Reply

    Kano is security safe and no signs of any communal, political or religious clashes

  17. Sunday Ogundele Reply

    what is differences and similarities between focus group discussion and interview techniques?

  18. It’s great having access to this writing…….. Thanks very much

  19. Ganesh prasad sahoo Reply

    its awesome. Its very helpful. It clear up all my doubts. Thank you so much Teacher.

  20. DHAHIA MBAGA Reply

    Thanks so much. It is helpful. It has clarified basic issues to look at when doing FGD

  21. Regie L. Lucero Reply

    This will help me a lot in conducting my thesis. Very helpful!!!

  22. Geoffrey S Muteyitsi Reply

    It has really influenced and triggered my aspirations as i have now gotten a commence point,which I believe I’ll be able to do a worthwhile work which am yet to start very soon.Thanks for your inputs.

  23. Shradha Roy Reply

    It is a wonderful read…….precise yet comprehensive for beginners in the field.

    Nice comprehension.

    Best regards

  24. what type of analysis should we use inorder to analyse the FGD data?

    • This is very important sessions, especilalay during conducting baseline and endline assessments. And I appreciate for your sharing on this.

      Many thanks.

  25. Kai walburga Reply

    Very helpful, interesting and inspiring. Feel much apt after reading through this paper. Looking forward for details on other qualitative methods in research.

  26. This is very important sessions, especilalay during conducting baseline and endline assessments. And I appreciate for your sharing on this.

    Many thanks.

  27. Bashir Ahmad Merzad Reply

    Thank you, it was effectively increased my knowledge on FGD.

  28. Fairuz Hidayat Reply

    Thank you for this article. Very informative and helpful.

  29. lincoln mutunga Reply

    Thank you much,it’s such an educative information to me.Base for understanding FGD.

  30. Hi! I will be using Focus group Discussion for my thesis. Does the guide questions to be used in the discussion needs to be validated? what validation and reliability test to use? I will be very thankful for your responses.

  31. Jepar gumacas Reply

    thank you for sharing this tells about fgd because it help me to improve our product…

  32. Great insight. I believe in most cases in-depth interviews are the way to go since they allow you to capture emotions. Thank you for sharing this perspective from a data firm.

  33. Wow! Your article is precise and concise. It indeed enlighten me.

  34. Pingback: Product Management 2019 Phase 1 : Finding your Target Market & Identifying Your Customers -

  35. I agreed that A focus group discussion (or FGD) is a qualitative research method in the social sciences, with a particular emphasis and application in the developmental program evaluation sphere.

  36. kiyuba ivan Reply

    Thanks very much for making a simplified guide to qualitative research.

    many people communicate but the each one has a different way to have others learning the context.

    thank you very once again.

    • Very useful article, just what I was looking for. Thank you for sharing.

  37. Alia Munir Reply

    This is a valuable resource for result oriented programmes assessment and help us to improve our skills

  38. Pingback: What’s Trending In Kushalgarh! – India Fellow

Write A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.